ANTIOCH, Calif. — A new child child was rushed to the emergency room with extreme burns, however there was no burn unit, nor any ambulances obtainable.
A California household tried to drive, however the physician would not allow them to. As a substitute, they had been pressured to take a $90,000 air ambulance for a 15-minute experience to the closest hospital.
“So we took him to the ER,” mentioned Antioch, California resident Jessica Farwell, as she teared up. “Sorry, it is so onerous to speak about. Simply seeing your child in a lot ache was similar to the worst feeling as a mother.”
Farwell described the frantic moments from October 2022: a rice cooker fell off her kitchen counter, severely burning her 6-month-old son, Brody.
“His pores and skin, it simply immediately bubbled up,” she mentioned. “I used to be similar to — is his face going to start out effervescent?”
Panicked, Farwell rushed Brody to a close-by hospital.
“They gave him fentanyl via his nostril as a result of he was screaming, and so they mentioned they did not have a burn unit,” Farewell mentioned. “So that they had been calling an ambulance, nevertheless it was the tip of COVID. There wasn’t going to be an ambulance for seven hours.”
She says docs deemed it medically essential to switch Brody to Shriners Kids’s Hospital in Sacramento. As a substitute of ready seven hours for an ambulance, Farwell requested if she may drive.
The drive would have taken roughly one hour and 20 minutes, however docs refused that choice after giving her son fentanyl to assist with the ache.
“They mentioned, ‘No, sorry, you may’t — I am unable to allow you to go away with him. I’ve already referred to as the helicopter.’ He principally instructed me there was nothing I may do,” Farwell recounted.
Farwell says the one choice they gave her was a 15-minute helicopter experience that price practically $90,000. She says docs assured her she would not get the invoice as a result of the hospital was requesting it and she or he had insurance coverage.
“I used to be simply completely terrified to fly — I am breaking down. He is screaming; it was simply terrible,” she mentioned.
Upon arriving on the helipad, she fell into one other entice: a required ambulance experience to get to the hospital entrance, which was solely 0.3 miles away.
“You’ll be able to see the hospital. You actually can stroll throughout the road to the hospital faster than that ambulance, and so they charged me $10,200,” Farwell mentioned.
“I perceive ambulances are high-tech equipment. They’re staffed by medical personnel who’ve specialised levels. However on the finish of the day, a 0.3-mile drive ought to by no means price a affected person $10,000,” mentioned Carmen Balber, govt director of Client Watchdog, a shopper advocacy group.
Brody’s second-degree burns had been handled, and he was discharged the following day.
However a pair months later, extra trauma got here within the mail: payments amounting to greater than $100,000 for the 15-minute helicopter experience and the 0.3-mile ambulance experience.
MORE: Bay Space couple accused of stealing rental automobile in Ohio in Thrifty mix-up
“I could not imagine my eyes,” Farwell mentioned. “You have a look at the payments, and it is completely enraging. We acquired hit for a $600 ready charge; there is a charge for it being a nighttime service. There’s simply each single charge you may consider.”
Regardless of what she says docs promised her, Farwell’s insurance coverage solely lined lower than half of the helicopter invoice, leaving her on the hook for $57,929.80. On prime of that, they solely lined a fraction of the ambulance invoice, leaving her accountable for one other $7,327.
All of this unfolded shortly after she left her job to assist look after her kids.
“I’ve referred to as the hospital, ambulance firm, my insurance coverage quite a few instances,” she mentioned. “It has been three years, after which they would not take heed to me or speak to me. They only stored giving me the runaround.”
Then got here fixed calls from assortment firms.
“So I used to be Googling, ‘what do I do? Who might help?'” Farwell mentioned. “Investigative reporters and ABC’s 7 On Your Aspect got here up!”
That is when she ABC San Francisco affiliate KGO.
Their staff reached out to all of the events concerned — and acquired each payments amounting to $100,032 waived.
“They referred to as, and mentioned, ‘it is completed, we are going to by no means invoice you once more.’ They virtually sounded apologetic. I hung up and instructed my husband. We simply could not imagine it!” Farwell mentioned. “All it took was filling out a kind in your guys’ web site. It is a miracle!”
For 3 years, Farwell thought these exorbitant payments would result in lawsuits, or perhaps a lien on her home — she was scared she’d lose every part.
“It simply blows my thoughts; I have been engaged on this for 3 years, and didn’t chip away at it. And inside a few days you had folks inside the insurance coverage firm and the hospital really making an attempt to assist!” Farwell mentioned. “I’ve laid my coronary heart out to those folks for 3 years however then you definitely guys become involved and so they’re scrambling; they’re completely scrambling.”
California has since handed a legislation, AB 716, that protects shoppers from shock billing for floor ambulance providers. For instance, insured sufferers are shielded from shock payments when utilizing out-of-network ambulances, and uninsured sufferers obtain discounted charges for floor ambulance providers.
“We now have a proper in California to pay solely in-network fees for emergency providers, whether or not that emergency is within the hospital, once you get an anesthesiologist who may be out-of-network or if that emergency is an ambulance and even an air ambulance that you just’re required to take when you haven’t any different choice,” mentioned Balber of Client Watchdog.
MORE: Out of dough: Walnut Creek bakery lacking $212K, checking account frozen after ID mishap
However Farwell’s $10,000 ambulance invoice didn’t get waived initially, partially as a result of the transport came about in 2022 — predating when that legislation went into impact in January of final yr.
In response to KGO’s inquiries, ambulance firm Professional Transport-1 provided the next assertion: “Whereas we really feel this situation nonetheless 100% lies with the insurance coverage firm merely deciding to go a part of the invoice to the affected person, we are going to settle for their partial cost and now not search the remaining stability of the invoice for our providers.”
Authorized consultants say it is not unusual for the ambulance firm to level fingers on the insurance coverage firm, and vice versa. It occurred on this case.
KGO repeatedly reached out to Blue Cross Blue Defend for additional remark.
The corporate was unable to reply questions and as a substitute offered the next assertion: “We do not remark publicly on particular member points. We’re dedicated to rising entry to secure, applicable, and efficient well being care primarily based on the perfect obtainable info and analysis, and in accordance with a member’s profit plan,” mentioned John Simley, communications director for Blue Cross Blue Defend overlaying Illinois, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
